Regarding test

Test should be more a test of the person who gives the test: how do you evaluate the person in front of you. Ask what he likes and what he has the most experiences in, ask him to describe it to you, evaluate his language skill, communication skill, critical thinking in the process. Don’t create any test that the candidate needs to spend extra time to prepare. The candidate only needs to do one thing and that is building up his portfolio. The person who evaluates should have the skills to get into details into any field, and know how to ask questions. So the test is more a test of the person who gives the test. With current testing, we saw too many crappy test givers and too many talented people suffering from those crappy tests. Repeat again: they should not spend any extra time just for the test. They only need to do well at what they are doing. Maybe they need to do some reflection and summarize their experiences. But we have tools to make that the ongoing process along the way. So they don’t have to do that particularly just for the test.

I still remember when I was taking a learning theory and technology course from a famous education school professor. When he discussed about test, I said plainly that I don’t like test. When asked why, I said it can never really test people’s understanding of the knowledge, and it wastes people’s time in doing the real thing. Instead, people can be evaluated just by what they have done and people should be given chances to try things.

I interview people and I hire them. I know the test is more a challenge to the test giver than the candidate. The candidate only needs to express themselves well. And expressing oneself well is the basic skill of anyone or anything who wants to play with others. As the person who evaluates, I need to look into their blogs, twitters, github and so on. I need to have a broad interest and have the knowledge to get into any field and need to know how to ask various questions, and is able to tell what I need to know, for example critical thinking ability, analytic skills, broad interests in tech or in life, design skills… Which college s/he goes to and the GPA? Doesn’t matter.

发表在 selflearning, 演讲 | 留下评论

Declaration of Self-learning, the long version

For the short version, read here.

Here we want to recognize what we have achieved in our understanding of learning, and call for further actions to lead to future learning.

The current prevailing education model, e.g. the school classroom based education model, or so called Compulsory Schooling, has only been around for 150 years. Its design goal is to strip away human beings’ higher capacities and keep only the lowest ones, so people can work along the assembly line and be part of the assembly line. So in this education system, human beings are just a higher form of machine.(John Taylor Gatto, The Underground History of American Education) But in the new era of economy, we need more people who are able to explore knowledge and think independently. The current increasingly severe crisis facing United States and other western countries lies in the fact that the far outdated education system cannot meet the needs of the new knowledge economy. So this is the era we are going to replace the old education model with the new one, one that brings out the true face of learning.

To do that, we have to think outside of the box of classroom, and think deeply what is learning and what is knowledge. We cannot turn to conventional educators for guidelines since lacking of learning experiences they only know of classrooms when it comes to learning and they tend to use all kinds of technologies to decorate their fancy classrooms. Without the concept of classroom, they are unable to think what is learning and what is knowledge. Fortunately, many years of practices and experiences from Sudbury Valley School, Summerhill and other democratic schools, from unschooling movement, and from many self-learners such as Mark Twain and Albert Einstein are the real rich nutrition we can turn to. Typically, we can learn from over 40 years of practices of Sudbury Valley School, a school that has no classroom, no homework and no exams and what kids there do all day is just playing:

  1. Learning is always self-directed, and children (adults too, of course) can make decisions on their own learning;
  2. Children can learn everything by playing. In sudbury schools, children play whatever they feel like playing;
  3. Children can equally participate in school matters, and if given that equal chances they participate in school matters in a rational and responsible way. Feeling and improving one’s surroundings is essential to the wholeness of a human being, and should never be taken away from one;
  4. Children learn in their daily lives. They don’t need to be isolated from their daily lives in order to learn. They also don’t need to be isolated from larger society for the purpose of learning;
  5. No external tests should be given to children. They can evaluate themselves according to their internal goals and from their playing. Children should feel of their own space instead of let that feeling being constantly interrupted and damaged by external tests;
  6. Sudbury staff do whatever they can to help protect children’s feeling of the space: space internally and space around. For example, children shouldn’t be timed with external clock. Children’s sense of themselves shouldn’t be interfered or driven by external tests. Children feel of their inner needs of learning. In sudbury schools, children can be with themselves. Children feel of their environments and make change to that environment, evaluate that change and make further improvement. Children participate in larger social life instead of being cut off and isolated from it. So you can see in sudbury schools, children feel fully of the space;
  7. Although children direct their own learning, sudbury staff also play an active role. They help make learning a little easier once learning needs arise. Sudbury staff made sudbury school a comprehensive supportive learning environment. They build a safe playground for children to play together.

So you can see sudubury experiences are simply about playing and feeling. No. 1 is the prerequisite of playing. No. 2 to No.4 are the content of playing. No. 5 and No. 6 are about feeling. No. 7 is about making learning easier and building a playground. I have to add it here that this playground very much mimics the playground the open source movement has built up for software programmers. It is all about making learning curve flatter and making things play with each other.

For those who still have doubts, it is not playing that distracts them from learning. It is external tests, meaningless homework and subjects they are not ready to learn that distract them. Actually playing provides all the context, drive, feedback and goals for their learning. They learn by playing. Please don’t ask me why playing. Playing is the primary activity. Learning is the secondary activity. Don’t sacrifice playing for learning.

Thus it is not school time that we have to guarantee our children. It is the play time that we have to guarantee them. People never became illiterate because they played too much. People became illiterate because they had to work day and night from a young age and had no time to play. Especially in the modern world where there are bookstores and internet anywhere, people don’t become illiterate because of playing.

Not only do we need to guarantee our children the time to play, we also need to guarantee them the time to pause and feel. We need to protect children’s time to be with themselves and feel of themselves. Children in sudbury are given time to be with themselves, to feel their internal clocks. And their feeling of the space is protected from external tests, meaningless homework and forced upon subjects, which are designed to destroy their sense of space and thus to make them unable to learn.

Trust us, play while equipped with strong feel is the most efficient way of learning. It may seem chaotic to the outsiders, but for the people doing it, they are following their own hearts and it is by all means following the natural order!

But this learning revolution is not just about children. It is actually more about us adults because it is us adults who already forgot what is learning and constantly interfered with children’s learning in a violent way.

We have put our minds into a cage called classroom. And without a classroom, either a physical one or a virtual one, we are unable to learn. Yes, we still learn intuitively and slowly little by little. But that speed of learning cannot catch up with the needs of the new era of economy and an increasingly sophisticated society. We need to learn a lot more. We need to learn big! We need to understand multiple domains of knowledge and understand the whole world. We need to be entrepreneurs and explore the world. People need to understand the sophisticated society and don’t get fooled by politicians and corporations. We need to build many things to make this world better. We need to empower ourselves by real learning! As the society gets more complicated and the world gets smaller, it is dangerous if we don’t upgrade our education system.

So let’s expand Sudbury School Model to the whole society including adults. Sudbury school is a safe playground for children to play together. For the adults, let’s turn the whole society into a better playground! Let’s make the whole society a comprehensive supportive learning environment!

We hereby call for actions:

  1. Call for the declaration of Freedom of Learning: individuals should have the right to decide for themselves what to learn, how to learn, from who to learn, when to learn and where to learn;
  2. Call for people who can truly bring technology and understanding of learning together. For that, software programmers need to turn to practices and experiences from Sudbury, Summerhill, and other democratic schools, and from the unschooling movement. They also need to be lifelong self-learners themselves and learn several big things in their lives and have very rich learning experiences. Only so, can we see how technology is really applied to learning and truly make the revolution happen. Especially we need to pay attention to various institutions that started to center learning around self-reflection, which has proven to be very effective in turning people who have been accustomed to school-way of learning (e.g. fixed, instigated) into a self-driven and self-initiated real life learning, and which is probably the major area that learning software will come from. With email, webpage, google, facebook, even with mobile internet and cloud computing, we are still at the beginning of this software revolution, which is a process of digitization of human world. We have been lingering around long enough not entering the core of that digitization. Now let’s march into the core! Let’s usher the era of consciousness software! We are all self-learners. Let’s make self-learning easier!
  3. Call for people of all ages, in school or out of school already, to engage in self-learning and learning in real life, to use self-reflection tools to help capture their learning every day and build up rich and well-structured knowledge, and to share that rich knowledge with others and guide others in their learning. The more people can learn out of school and in real life, the less significant school will be. When I was in college, only 5 to 10% of my knowledge was learned in school. As we build up strong self-learning communities and show people the power and richness of self-learning, we can make the old classroom based education model obsolete and replace it with this new one;
  4. Call for all organizations to participate in making the whole society a comprehensive supportive learning environment. We need various organizations to carry out their own education responsibility for the community. For example, hospitals should be the place for people to learn about health knowledge and law firms should be the place for people to learn of knowledge related to law. We need various organizations to open up their office space for young people (or not that young people) to tour during certain hours or over the weekends for learning purpose, or set up internship and programs for young people (or not that young people). We need various kinds of open labs and hacker space where people can learn and build stuff;
  5. Call for more comprehensive evaluation of people’s skills and capacities. For example, ability to explore and think independently is definitely an important skill. Devise tools or methodologies to make that evaluation easier for employers. The whole society needs to be more mature in how to comprehensively evaluate people’s working skills and capacities. And the internship we mentioned above is a key part of it. It would be the best if we programmers can build up some kind of crowdsourcing task distribution system and badge system that can rank people’s skills in different categories and levels according to the tasks they accomplished. At least, in some industry, that is possible.

We strongly believe that the future learning will be all about learn while play. People fully engage in playing, which means several things including improving their environment and participating in larger society. The learning part can be done by strong feeling. For that we can have meditation sessions that help people feel of themselves and things around (feel of space) with great clarity. We can also have software that help people capture their experiences and do self-reflection, at the same time build up well-structured knowledge and share that knowledge. Everyone can become a teacher, and they can teach in their spare time. Especially the barrier for teaching effectively will be extremely low for those who excel at their professions and do really possess the knowledge. We believe the future learning and teaching will be in this way. People don’t have to lock themselves up in an isolated environment for so long just for the purpose of learning. That is too industrial age. People can learn continuously and naturally in the same way they learn when they are very little: learn by play. The whole society will be the supportive comprehensive learning environment. That is our vision of future learning!

Self-learning was the reality from day one of human history, and has always been there throughout our history, even in the dark age of Compulsory Schooling. In term of accomplishing its design goal, Compulsory Schooling can be called a success. But as we enter the era of economy that calls for more explorers of knowledge and independent thinkers, we have to say to Compulsory Schooling:”Mission over. You are now dismissed!” Now it is time to bring forward the real learning. Now it is time to make human beings complete and return human beings to their full potential. In our time, instead of being choice of a few, self-learning is going to scale up to a massive level and become the mainstream way of learning. As the Compulsory Schooling was designed to prevent people from understanding the whole and thus being entrepreneurs, in this new age of economy, we need more people to be whole and be entrepreneurs. We need more people to explore social knowledge, build social products and solve social problems. It is the age about our happiness!

So together let’s bring out the true face of learning!

Let’s end with this from Kurt Vonnegut’s “Cat’s Cradle”:

“Self-taught, are you?” Julian Castle asked Newt.

“Isn’t everybody?” Newt inquired.

“Very good answer.”  

发表在 selflearning | 留下评论

Declaration of Self-learning Version 2

For the newest version, read it here.

Here we want to recognize what we have achieved in our understanding of learning, and call for further actions to lead to future learning.

The current prevailing education model, e.g. the school classroom based education model, or so called Compulsory Schooling, has only been around for 150 years. Its design goal is to strip away human beings’ higher capacities and keep only the lowest ones, so people can work along the assembly line and be part of the assembly line. So in this education system, human beings are just a higher form of machine.(John Taylor Gatto, The Undergraduate History of American Education) But in the new era of economy, we need more people who are able to explore knowledge and think independently. The current increasingly severe crisis facing United States and other western countries lies in the fact that the far outdated education system cannot meet the needs of the new knowledge economy. So this is the era we are going to replace the old education model with the new one, one that brings out the true face of learning.

To do that, we have to think outside of the box of classroom, and think deeply what is learning and what is knowledge. We cannot turn to conventional educators for guidelines since lacking of learning experiences they only know of classrooms when it comes to learning and they tend to use all kinds of technologies to decorate their fancy classrooms. Without the concept of classroom, they are unable to think what is learning and what is knowledge. Fortunately, many years of practices and experiences from Sudbury Valley School, Summerhill and other democratic schools, from unschooling movement, and from many self-learners such as Mark Twain and Albert Einstein are the real rich nutrition we can turn to. Typically, we can learn from over 40 years of practices of Sudbury Valley School, a school that has no classroom, no homework and no exams and what kids there do all day is just playing:

  • Learning is always self-directed, and children (adults too, of course) can make decisions on their own learning;

  • Children can equally participate in school matters, and if given that equal chances they participate in school matters in a rational and responsible way. Such active participation in improving their surroundings is a big part of children’s learning and is what make them complete as human beings;

  • Children can learn everything by playing. (Why? The needs of learning come from being social and playing, and they gain feedback of their learning from playing as well. Children naturally will like one thing at a time. After they have fully played and fully learned, another thing will gradually draw their interests. So they get to learn everything by playing. If they happen to find what they love to play for their whole lives, either by then they probably have tried and played many other things or they love this thing so much that they will learn everything with this thing. So no need to worry about children playing. Before children grow to full adults, their playing time should be guaranteed since that is their learning time to prepare them to become fully responsible adultsand playing is the natural way of learning);

  • Children learn in their daily lives. They don’t need to be isolated from their daily lives in order to learn. They also don’t need to be isolated from larger society for the purpose of learning;

  • No external tests should be given to children. They can evaluate themselves according to their internal goals and from their playing. Children should feel of their own space instead of let that feeling being interrupted and damaged by external tests;

  • Sudbury staff do whatever they can to help protect children’s feeling of the space: space internally and space around. For example, children shouldn’t be timed with external clock. Children’s sense of themselves shouldn’t be interfered or driven by external tests. Children feel of their inner needs of learning. Children feel of their environments and make change to that environment, evaluate that change and make further improvement. Children participate in larger social life instead of being cut off and isolated from it;

  • In addition to protecting children’s feeling of the space, sudbury staff also help make (self-) learning a little easier once learning needs arise. In summary, sudbury staff made sudbury school a comprehensive supportive learning environment;

There are many other lessons from sudbury practices. But to keep the manifesto brief, we stop here. Sudbury book Free at Last is a good book for you to read further.

So let’s have our future learning built based on these practices and experiences. Let’s expand Sudbury Model to the whole society, including adults, and make the whole society a comprehensive supportive learning environment. First, let us summarize our understanding of learning on a deep level. Especially we will summarize it in a way that helps digitize learning :

  • Learning is to shape our internal brain structure to match external world. So of course, it is both social and internal. It is never separated from real life. Learning activities are external, and they are scattered and everywhere. People engage in various activities in their daily lives to accumulate drops of experiences in various domains of knowledge over a long period of time. But learning is also very internal. Learners need to feel the space of themselves and the outside world. One needs to feel where they are and where they need to go in their learning. Self-reflection is central to one’s learning. One needs to discern what they have experienced and reflect on their experiences over a period of time;

  • Associated with the understanding above is that knowledge is flowing everywhere and has many layers. Knowledge at the bottom layer connects knowledge at the top together. People are sensing knowledge in different domains on different layers in their various activities. And once deeper knowledge is formed, it helps recall knowledge at the top when faced with new situations. Trying to make connections and forming deeper knowledge is “understanding”of knowledge;

  • Thus the basic skills of learning are breaking down (analyzing) and putting together (comprehending). Learners need to break down knowledge into various parts and sense them in various activities. Learners then need to put their drops of experiences in various activities together to achieve an understanding of the knowledge on the whole. Self-reflection is the way you practice these two basic learning skills, and through self-reflection you get to pull all the experiences in various activities together to form meaningful learning;

  • Since learning is never separated from real life, learning surely can be and should be driven by curiosity. Thus people can learn everything by playing. Thus we want people to have as much time as possible to engage in playing, and only spend the necessary time on reviewing their drops of experiences gained in playing to achieve the whole and deeper knowledge in order to play better;

  • Since real life learning is the main way of learning, the so called “informal” learning is actually the formal learning. Real life learning is the formal learning.

And we call for actions:

  • Call for Freedom of Learning: individuals should have the right to decide for themselves what to learn, how to learn, from who to learn, when to learn and where to learn;

  • Call for people who can truly bring technology and understanding of learning together. For that, software programmers need to turn to practices and experiences from Sudbury, Summerhill, and other democratic schools, and from the unschooling movement. They also need to be lifelong self-learners themselves and learn several big things in their lives and have very rich learning experiences. Only so, can we see how technology is really applied to learning and truly make the revolution happen. Especially we need to pay attention to various institutions that started to center learning around self-reflection, which is probably the major area that learning software will come from. With email, webpage, google, facebook, even with mobile internet and cloud computing, we are still at the beginning of this software revolution, which is a process of digitization of human world. We have been lingering around long enough not entering the core of that digitization. Now let’s march into the core! Let’s usher the era of consciousness software! We are all self-learners. Let’s make self-learning easier!

  • Call for people of all ages, in school or out of school already, to engage in self-learning and learning in real life. The more you can learn out of school and in real life, the less significant school will be. That is the way we make the old classroom based education model obsolete and replace it with the new one;

  • Call for all organizations to participate in making the whole society a comprehensive supportive learning environment. We need various organizations to carry out their own education responsibility for the community. For example, hospitals should be the place for people to learn about health knowledge and law firms should be the place for people to learn of knowledge related to law. We need various organizations to open up their office space for young people (or not that young people) to tour during certain hours or over the weekends for learning purpose, or set up internship and programs for young people (or not that young people). We need various open labs where people can practice and learn;

  • Call for more comprehensive evaluation of people’s skills and capacities. For example, ability to explore and think independently is definitely an important skill. Devise tools or methodologies to make that evaluation easier for employers. The whole society needs to be more mature in how to comprehensively evaluate people’s working skills and capacities. And the internship we mentioned above is a key part of it. It would be the best if we programmers can build up some kind of crowdsourcing task distribution system and badge system that can rank people’s skills in different categories and levels according to the tasks they accomplished. At least, in some industry, that is possible.

Self-learning was the reality from day one of human history, and has always been there throughout our history, even in the dark age of Compulsory Schooling. In term of accomplishing its design goal, Compulsory Schooling can be called a success. But as we enter the era of economy that calls for more explorers of knowledge and independent thinkers, we have to say to Compulsory Schooling:”Mission over. You are now dismissed!” Now it is time to bring forward the real learning. Now it time to make human beings complete and return human beings to their full potential. In our time, instead of being choice of a few, self-learning is going to scale up to a massive level and become the mainstream way of learning. As the Compulsory Schooling was designed to prevent people from understanding the whole and thus being entrepreneurs, in this new age of economy, we need more people to be whole and be entrepreneurs. We need more people to explore social knowledge, build social products and solve social problems, for example, how music should be shared and how artists can better support themselves, how seniors can live better lives, healthcare… It is the age about our happiness!

So together let’s bring out the true face of learning!

发表在 selflearning | 留下评论

Declaration of Self-learning Version 1

For the new version, read on this page.

Here we want to recognize what we have achieved in our understanding of learning, and call for further actions to lead to future learning.

1. The current prevailing education model, e.g. the school classroom based education model, or so called Compulsory Schooling, has only been around for 150 years. Its design goal is to strip away human beings’ higher capacities and keep only the lowest ones, so people can work along the assembly line and be part of the assembly line. So in this education system, human beings are just a higher form of machine. But in the new era of economy, we need more people who are able to explore knowledge and think independently. The current increasingly severe crisis facing United States and other western countries lies in the fact that the far outdated education system cannot meet the needs of the new knowledge economy. So this is the era we are going to replace the old education model with the new one, one that brings out the true face of learning.

2. Fortunately, many years of practices and experiences from Sudbury Valley School, Summerhill and other democratic schools, from unschooling movement, and from many self-learners such as Mark Twain and Albert Einstein, tell us what is learning and what is knowledge. Typically, what sudbury practices tell us:

a) learning is always self-directed, and children (adults too, of course) can make decisions on their own learning;

b) children can equally participate in school matters, and if given that equal chances they participate in school matters in a rational and responsible way;

c) children can learn everything by playing;

d) children learn in their daily lives. They feel of their surroundings and make improvement to their surroundings;

e) no external tests should be given to children. They can evaluate themselves according to their internal goals. Children should feel of their own space instead of being interrupted by external tests;

f) sudbury staff do whatever they can to help protect children’s feeling of the space: space internally and space around. For example, children shouldn’t be timed with external clock. Children’ s sense of themselves shouldn’t be interfered or driven by external tests. Children feel of their inner needs of learning. Children feel of their environments and make change to that environment, evaluate that change and make further improvement. Children participate in larger social life instead of being cut of and isolated from it;

g) … there are many other lessons from sudbury practices. But to keep the manifesto brief, we stop here. Sudbury book Free at Last is a good book for you to read further.

3. So let’s have our future learning built based on these practices and experiences. Specifically, let’s:

a) Call for Freedom of Learning: individuals should have the right to decide for themselves what to learn, how to learn, from who to learn, when to learn and where to learn.

b) Acknowledge our understanding of learning:

i. Learning activities are external and they are scattered and everywhere. But learning is very internal. Learners need to feel the space of themselves and the outside world. Self-reflection is a vital learning skill. Learners need to pull all their learning experiences from various learning activities together to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the domain knowledge. In fact, learning is to shape our internal understanding to match external world. Of course, it is both social and internal;

ii. Since learning is scattered and everywhere, it is never separated from real life. Thus learning surely can be and should be driven by curiosity. Thus people can learn everything by playing. And they learn best by playing because at the very least the learning needs all come from playing, and that is the natural way of how learning happens;

iii. Once people start exploring knowledge, they will realize the source of knowledge is from real life. So people have to learn in real life;

iv. The so called “informal” learning is actually the formal learning. Real life learning is the formal learning.

c) Call for people who can truly bring technology and understanding of learning together. For that, software programmers need to turn to practices and experiences from Sudbury, Summerhill, and other democratic schools, and from the unschooling movement. They also need to be life long self-learners themselves and learn several big things in their lives and have very rich learning experiences. Only so, can we see how technology is really applied to learning and truly make the revolution happen. In the process of digitization of human world, we need to march into the core! Let’s usher the era of consciousness software!

Self-learning was the reality from day one of human history, and has always been there throughout human history, even in the dark age of Compulsory Schooling. In term of accomplishing its design goal, Compulsory Schooling is a success. But as we enter the era of economy that calls for more explorers of knowledge and independent thinkers, we have to say to Compulsory Schooling:”Mission over. You are now dismissed!” Now it is time to bring forward the real learning, in which self-learning is going to scale up to a massive level and become the mainstream way of learning.

So together let’s bring out the true face of learning!

发表在 selflearning | 留下评论

Consciousness Software

What we are building here at OSL is a kind of consciousness software, which helps people manage their consciousness.

One way to look at it, consciousness software is a deeper level of digitization of human world. As internet is transforming and affecting deeper of human society, we definitely see that the learning/education world will be fundamentally restructured.

Or you can look at it in another way, the previous waves of digitization have left people with a mess with their data. They have to go to various sites to enter their data, and the data they entered mostly don’t belong to them anymore, or at the least they don’t have any control on it. So we want to restructure internet in a way that we go back to where data come from, let people manage their own data and really “own” their data on their private storage. People choose to share that data with other people(team) or public. Once in public, companies can use that data to build their services. If that service is profitable, the data owners gain a percentage of that profit. The data owners also always own their data, which means they can take back their data if they want (depending on how they have chosen to share their data with public supposing there should be several mechanisms for choosing from).

This is the idea that Opera Unite has proposed on restructuring Internet, although they didn’t touch on the semantic part. The semantic part resembles the efforts in semantic web a little, but still quite different and simpler.

发表在 科学研究 | 一条评论

What we learned from Sudbury Valley School?

We can learn many things about learning/education from sudbury experiences. In fact, we can learn everything about learning/education from their practices. Here I want to list four of them for you to consider.

First, sudbury protects children’s feeling of space, either space of themselves or space of the surrounding. For example, children have the time to be with themselves without being interrupted by others. They are not timed with class clocks or any external schedules. They listen to their own hearts and they feel of themselves. They can also feel of the surrounding, and try to change it for the better. They equally participate in the process of making their schools better. In contrast, students in traditional schools have their feelings of the space constantly interrupted, destroyed and denied.

Such feeling of space is very vital of one’s learning. Without feeling of one’s internal and surrounding space, one is unable to learn. Self-reflection is the center of learning. However, many people coming out of school haven’t learned how to reflect.

Secondly, children are also a group of people. At any place that you have a group of people, you will have what a group of people will have. For example, how to clean up the place. People are different, and they have different likes and dislikes. Since they live in the same space, they need to resolve the conflicts. People want to form various interest groups. So as we can see in sudbury practice, they have the honor system, the personal account, Judicial Committee, school meeting, clubs, and so on. In traditional schools, since adults have the absolute power over children, they simply take everything under their control and simplify everything by making children simply being governed, thus denying children their feeling of the space. So this is why more and more people start to realize this is more about “how to be democratic”.

This alone probably makes sudbury very difficult to reproduce massively. Actually sudbury model is not too costly or complex to reproduce massively. The obstacle is mainly mental, e.g. people’s understanding of equality and how they trust children. This is a profound issue and it will take people many many years to truly understand it. But it doesn’t mean it cannot spread out to become mainstream. Especially with the help of internet and software, we will make that spreading happening faster.

Thirdly, learning is never separated from real life. As the principle of sudbury said, children learn little by little in their daily lives, and when they combine all those experiences together, they try to build up that knowledge. Since learning is never separated from your real life and what you do, learning can surely be driven by curiosity.

Fourthly, whether children should have the freedom of learning? Whether they can be trusted? I think this is a very deep worry in many people’s minds. From my own life experience, I strongly believe children should have that freedom and they can be trusted to guide themselves. I think sudbury experiences also proved so. If we want to talk about this philosophically, I can also talk convincingly why so. The practical question here is how to ensure children’s right in making decisions on their own learning be protected? Should we declare something like “Freedom of Learning”?

So if you are only working with adult learning, do sudbury experiences give inspiration to your work? We think they surely do. Although adults are not confined by schools and classes as how children are, adults are still confined by the conceptual model of learning they got used to after more than 10 or 20 years in school. So when they build online learning software, they still think in term of class based learning in school. Only after all these years, they start to realize little by little that they are not bound by anything on the internet and thus start to make learning a little more flexible (Khan Academy, MOOC, for example). Still the great potential of internet for learning is untapped. Few people are really building learning software that we need in the internet age.

So what kind of learning software we need in the internet age? I have been thinking and exploring this for many years. What have been really helpful in my exploration are: my own schooling experiences, especially my primary school experiences, which mimic sudbury experiences quite well; my broad learning experiences in various fields; my reading of works from John Taylor Gatto, Sudbury, Summerhill and all those unschooling practices. They are very rich nutrition; my broad teaching experiences of various groups of people (children, migrating manual labor workers, college students, young professionals, seniors…); the unique research methodology:exploration with software. If you are interested in seeing what kind of software we are building here, you can check out summarization of our work, and the projects page. Particularly I want to mention briefly knowledge engine here (a notebook to turn experiences into knowledge). It helps train people’s reflection skills and helps people feel of the space. By doing so, it also aids people learn in real life. Surely sudbury children are already doing so. Sudbury children are already very strong self-learners. But this tool still can help the self-learners with their learning, just as it has helped me with my daily learning. Also the result of learning and the knowledge constructed can be some kind of demonstration of what they have learned, and they can also use it to teach others. This tool is to make learning not separated from your everyday activities. It is to lower the barrier of self-learning and thus make learning truly pervasive, instead of being isolated and withering.

Sudbury experiences have shown us what learning really is. With that understanding, we need to build learning software that really helps self-learners and makes self-learning pervasive. Learning activities are definitely scattered and everywhere. Learning is never separated from real life. We are all self-learners. Together let’s bring out the true face of learning.

发表在 科学研究, selflearning | 留下评论

超级反向课堂

英文版

现在很多人做互联网教育,想的还是学校课堂的模式。所以我们看各种学习网站,不外乎都是课堂式的课件,或者视频,或者讲座活动。其实这样的一堂课,于学习者不过也就是对该领域的知识多了点认识和理解。而这种认识和理解不一定要通过这样的课堂来获取。比如说可以通过阅读,可以通过和他人的交流,可以通过做项目等等,甚至是生活中其他相关事情的触发。知识是到处流动的,彼此关联的,很可能你在接触或者学习其他东西的时候就会增进你这个领域知识的理解。很多时候,为了获得这些理解,与其去上这样那样的网络课程,不如通过这些其他的方式可以更快的获取。

所以对于互联网教育,与其去构建这样的课堂,不如去走进学习者的内心,去构建学习者内心的课堂。对于学习者来说,他要去构建的这个知识,比如产品设计或者人力资源管理,他可以通过各种方式去获得那些重要的认识或理解,然后把这些认识或理解全部综合起来,构建出他对这个领域的知识,这就是他内心的课堂。这首先是个反向的课堂,和传统课堂不一样,传统课堂是由教学的老师或者教育者去为学生们建设的课堂,而这个内心的课堂是学习者自己在自己大脑里构建的课堂,反映了他自己对知识的理解。其次这是个超级的课堂。因为这个课堂包括了他从各种资源各种活动获得的关于这个领域知识的所有重要的资源和认识/理解。而传统课堂是非常有限的,你可能只能获得关于这个领域知识的某一个方面的体会,仅仅是内心课堂的很小一部分。

如果我们要真正的实现以学习者为中心的学习,我们就要给他们合适的工具帮助他们构建他们自己内心的超级课堂。这种超级课堂可以是动态的,非实时的,一直持续进行的。比如说我在构建产品经理这个内心课堂的时候,我对产品化思维可能会从某个方面有些理解。我记录并分享出来后,其他人可以做评论并形成讨论。经过一段时间的积累,大家就可以看到这个产品经理内心课堂里重要的知识点以及每个点后面的那些讨论。

我们需要有好的工具去帮助学习者去构建他内心的课堂,并且能够展现分享出来。其他的学习者可以通过peer learning的方式来参与共同学习,而老师或者已经有丰富经验的学习者(老师也是学习者啊)可以通过这个内心课堂去引导这个学习者的学习,实现“教”的意义。

软件就是关于人类世界各个领域的数字化的工作。互联网教育这么多年,还一直难以发挥出真正的威力,就是因为我们一直在数字化那些由老师们构建的课堂,而实际上那种外在的课堂是无处不在的,可以说人生何处不课堂。在这个方面进行数字化工作,可以说是徒劳的。这个可能很多教育领域的人都有感受。你费心费力的去做些教学视频出来,你到底是做视频的还是做教育的?你辛辛苦苦的组织学习活动,你到底是组织活动的还是做教育的?难道不是教育者做的视频就没有教育作用?我大学里很多的人文学习就是通过看西方电影和小说完成的。很多思辨能力就是通过看南方周末这样的报纸杂志培养的或者通过在街头的很多商业和销售方面的兼职工作锻炼出来的。。难道教育者们应该拍更好的电影,写更好的小说,办更好的报纸?

所以真正应该互联网发力的,真正应该去数字化的,是这个内心的超级课堂。帮助每个人去构建去分享自己内心的超级课堂才是未来互联网教育之路。这才是学习/教育数字化的方向。 这些会作为意识软件的一部分一起兴起。

其实,这个内心的超级课堂,就是知识啊!知识的本质,就是个体的过去的经验可以在新的场合实时的被唤起帮助识别问题解决问题。而要做到及时的准确的唤起,就是依靠对各种经验的一定的抽象和结构。而这个内心的超级课堂,就是去不断的去构建更好的带结构的经验和认识。 只有当我们把数字化学习的重心放到内心的课堂上时,我们才可能真正的让“学习”内容丰富起来,让知识丰富起来。

发表在 selflearning, 演讲 | 2条评论

改变学习内容的生产方式

英文版

互联网学习/教育要有大的发展,我们必须改变当前学习内容的生产方式。

传统的学习内容的生产方式,是内容生产者和知识的所有者或专家进行沟通,把专家所拥有的知识转化成教学内容。这样的生产方式,成本是非常巨大并且非常消耗时间的,内容生产的周期很长。这样的生产方式所形成的后果是学习内容的极度匮乏,涵盖面太少,不能满足人们在生活工作实际中的学习需求。内容经常是非常过时的,缺乏更新的,没有人打理的,和充满了各种错误的。在知识高速发展的知识经济时代,这样的学习内容生产方式显然是不能满足需求的。对于处于这个知识经济时代中的企业,这样的内容生产方式也是无法满足员工每日的大量的学习需求。所以我们可以看到,很多人喜欢到博客微博等等地方去学习,大家想了解什么知识,多去那些地方去寻找,因为这些地方的知识,即使知识性不是那么强,至少是及时的,丰富的,更能满足人们的学习需求。

我们可以看到传统的学习内容生产方式有两大隔离。 第一个隔离是内容生产者和知识所有者之间的隔离。这个上面已经提到。另一个隔离是教与学之间的隔离。学习的人并不能够主动的参与到学习内容的建设中去,知识专家们也不能够从学习者这里获得知识的反馈。

这两大隔离,造成了静态的知识而非动态的知识。这恐怕是因为大家对知识的一种潜意识上的假设,即知识是静态的,而非动态的。知识一旦获取就不再改变,所以专家们不用再去更新这些知识。而学习者,他们还没有学会知识,没有拥有该知识,所以他们对这个领域就没有任何知识,他们也不能对知识建设做出任何贡献。

这样的认识,首先在知识高速发展的知识经济时代,肯定是不合适的了。现在大家更多的是在一个共同探索知识的进程中。在知识经济时代,我们需要的不是大多数人仅仅根据少数知识专家发现的规律去做简单的操作,我们需要的是更多的人可以加入到知识探索的过程中来,他们需要知道知识是怎么来的,有哪些不足的地方,如何去改进这些知识。如今的时代,不是大多数人都工作在流水线上做着机械单调重复的工作。现在只需要占人口比例很少的人去从事这样的工作,而更多的人从事的是复杂性的知识性工作。美国目前的高失业率,一方面大量的人从传统的制造业失业出来一直找不到工作,而另一方面受软件影响的新兴产业需要大量的有独立思维能力有探索能力的人,却找不到合适的人。这是个教育问题。在互联网改变的经济里,越来越多的是社会产品的生产。所谓社会产品即解决社会需求的产品,如教育,养老等等。通过互联网的探索,我们对这些社会领域的知识会大大丰富,这是一个真正爆炸性呈上亿倍规模成长的领域。而我们人类以前在这些领域的社会科学,远远不能满足这些探索的需求。所以这些新的生产一定是需要大量的有独立思考能力有知识探索能力的人在其中就业的。而现有的教育模式不能提供这样的人造成了最大的矛盾。

如果这些人参与到知识的探索中来,他们就会发现知识的探索过程,一定是和生活的方方面面相关的。知识并不是束之高阁的东西,知识是和生活的方方面面相关想通的,这样知识才有活水之源,才可能更新变化有所突破。这点,常常为传统的教育模式所忽略,是我们做互联网教育的,最需要有所认识的地方。

我们如何能够消除这些隔离?让知识专家们在自己探索知识的时候就可以一边探索一边积累建设自己的知识,并和外界分享。其他人通过学习这些专家们分享出来的知识,也可以以某种方式参与到知识的构建中去。知识专家并不是专门为学习者去生产“学习内容”,其只是分享自己的知识,而这个知识是一直在构建中的,所以专家们对自己构建的知识一定是在每日打理的并不断更新的。

当我们看看各种博客,微博或者社交网站,里面有很丰富的内容。如果我想了解某方面的知识,我经常会去那里找,然后去构建。那么这些博客,微博或者社交网站,算不算学习解决方案?这些地方,算不算学习场所?这个问题这里问出来,先留给大家思考。

2008年美国的TeachStreet出来的时候,其实我早有那样的网站的想法。一直没有去做的一个很重要的原因是必须解决内容的问题。虽然TeachStreet专注的是生活中的学习,但是如果没有好的学习内容的生产方式,不会对用户产生粘性的,也无法由生活中的学习去把知识丰富起来,去真正挑战传统的教育模式,只能沦为兴趣爱好的“非正式学习”场所。所以TeachStreet的失败并不出我所料。国内的第九课堂,模式跟TeachStreet一样。曾经问其创始人,与TeachStreet有什么不同。他说不出来,只说团队执行能力肯定不一样。

Evernote作为个人笔记,其实也和那些博客,微博一样,成为人们分享知识的一个地方。但是跟博客微博等一样,Evernote仍然是非常缺乏结构性的,知识性仍然不强。Evernote的创始人说他们计划逐步推出更多的结构性的东西,让Everntoe的知识性更强一些。

互联网发展到今天,在经历了对衣食住行,购物,游戏等领域的数字化以后,逐步开始进入人类世界更深层次的数字化,比如学习教育领域。我们也可以以一种比较简单化的方式这么看,在google引领了沟通和信息领域的第一波数字化和facebook引领了人与人之间的关系的第二波数字化后,第三波数字化应该是人类意识领域的数字化,即意识软件(consciousness software)的兴起。在互联网时代,我们需要更好的管理我们的意识。我有什么心得体会要与人分享,为什么我需要去这个微博,那个微信或者社交网去一个个的发。我写什么文章,这篇文章的构建来自于一长段时间里在某个领域的经验积累,我如何能够更快的定位这些经验,我是不是在重复很多以前说过的东西?要做好这些事情,我们就需要深入人类的意识领域,去观察学习和知识形成到底是怎么回事。在这个层面上,我们才可能更好的理解到底什么是学习,什么是知识。我们的学习,知识构建,分享交流,这些都是连续性的意识管理的过程,应该有更好的工具去帮助我们去做这些事情。有了这些软件工具,我们才可能真正的参与到知识的探索中去,让知识回到其真正的生活之源去,成为活的流动着的结构,而不是死的布满蛛网的“知识”。

在如今这样一个充满探索性的互联网时代,一个组织的学习能力将越来越重要的成为这个组织的核心竞争力。在员工的工作性质已经是充满了探索式学习的情况下,我们做互联网学习人如何不拖后腿,不为旧的教育模式所束缚,真正的支持员工的这种探索式学习,帮助组织真正成为学习型组织,有很多需要思考的东西,有很多需要探索性去学习的东西。我们很荣幸,能够有机会去在这个转折点上去促成新的教育方式的形成,使得学习和教育得以归其本来面目。能够以和平的力量去促使这个世界变得更加美好,这是一件非常荣幸的事情。

发表在 selflearning, 演讲 | 留下评论

Summarization of our findings

We want to summarize our finding here, so you know what we have achieved through our work. We want to be brief here in this essay so that you can quickly grasp it.

We tried in many domains of education and did various experimentation. Our goal is to find out on a deeper level what is knowledge and what is learning, and how that understanding can help us building software for education or learning in the internet age.

What is Knowledge?

So here is what we find out about knowledge. We summarize as below:

  • Knowledge is of big blocks. Knowledge is understanding of the whole, otherwise it is just information.
  • Knowledge is flowing. When different knowledge comes together and condense, it forms a concrete matter or thing that we can recognize as a human being. So anything in real life must contain multiple dimensions of knowledge.
  • Learning is to interact with these various things, to extract out one particular dimension of knowledge, and to accumulate drops of experience in that dimension of knowledge. Thus learning cannot and should not be separated from daily activities. We should learn in real life, and learn by doing it. So learning activities must be very scattered and everywhere, and one core ability of learning is to extract out that dimension of knowledge from various scattered activities. We need to know how to break down.
  • Then we put all our Significant Experiences together, try to achieve an understanding of the whole. Here we need another core learning ability, which is to summarize and to comprehend.
  • The key of learning is reflection. The above two activities of thinking (breaking down and comprehending) are the two basic forms of reflection.
  • Knowledge needs to be applied. After you gain the understanding of the knowledge on the whole, you will not be limited by the literal expression of the knowledge, and you will be able to “see” knowledge flowing everywhere in real life.
  • Since there is no need to separate learning and daily activities, surely learning is naturally driven by what you are interested to learn.

Above we briefly summarized our understanding of knowledge and learning. For more of our understanding of what is knowledge, you can view our frame (a frame is an outline that includes several notes or other frames) What is Knowledge. Below we want to list some daily phenomena to show how they are anti-learning and anti-knowledge.

Anti-learning and anti-knowledge phenomena

  • People often pride themselves on possessing a large amount of information, and others often get intimated by them.
  • People got confined by the literal expression of knowledge, lack of true understanding of it, and cannot recognize knowledge in other forms.
  • School teachers generally lack experiences in the subject they are teaching. They cannot tell which ones are more important in the textbook, and often waste students’ time by reading from page to page.
  • When in school, people are very diligent in keeping notes. However, once out of school, they seldom make any notes.
  • If schools cannot teach people courage, at the very least, they should be able to teach students on self-reflection. However, after so many years in school, many people still don’t know how to reflect.
  • Whenever people think of learning, they think of going to school, or paying money to take courses. They think of getting a degree of certificate.
  • People tend to think that learning is the duty of the kids (shouldn’t it be a right?).Only kids need to learn. Adults don’t need to learn anymore. We already learned painting and geography at school, we don’t need to learn them anymore.
  • Since knowledge is always taught instead of being explored out of one’s own needs and curiosity, people lack the ability to explore knowledge.

There are too many of these to be all listed here. But I think you get what I mean.

The learning in the internet age

Internet has already changed how people learn. When we talk about how internet changed our world, on a deep level, I think the overall change is to bring us closer to the core values of human being. Of course, that is a big topic. But when people talk about the agile programming methodologies and compare that to the traditional ones such as waterfall, I think it is of that kind of change. When it comes to learning, we can also say that learning in the internet age is becoming more agile, instead of waterfall.

The traditional education is waterfall style instead of iterative. Learning at the internet age, is to meet the needs at hand quickly, and keep getting feedback along the way. The traditional education, however, has a grand design at the very beginning, and you don’t get feedback for a very long time.

The traditional education is separated from experiences, while learning in the internet age is all about gaining experiences quickly.

Thus learning activities in the internet age must be scattered and everywhere. We cannot demand people to just come to our place to learn. That would be too wide a range to cover and too costly. This is the pitfalls of many online education efforts. However, reflection after those scattered activities is the place that we can focus on. Especially, because learning activities are scattered and everywhere, learners need some learning software to help “pull all the strings” and coordinate all the learning efforts. If we say software is to digitize human world, this is what learning software in the internet age should digitize.

Here let me give an example of such kind of learning at the internet age. I use Linux, for work and for life. And I am learning shell programming. So as I am using Linux every day, I will encounter issues, for which I can quickly find solutions on the internet. So I learn little by little about various aspects of shell programming. After some time, I may have accumulated quite many of them. Then I put them together, and try to figure out the rules of shell programming and understand the essence of it. You can also find a book to read it very quickly at this stage. So you can see this kind of learning is very fast, with little waste of time. You also get to train your reflection and abilities to explore knowledge.

So what does the above help us design learning software for the internet age?

First of all, it has to be based on Significant Experiences, since Significant Experiences are the center of all the things above.

Secondly, learning should not be separated from daily life and work. People accumulate Significant Experiences through their daily lives and work.

Third, through simple editing operations, people work on Significant Experiences and accomplish the task of reflection. The result is a dynamic streaming structure, e.g. knowledge.

So any knowledge related cooperation, such as peer learning or teaching, should be based on the Significant Experiences. For example, teaching can be done by giving feedback to Significant Experiences directly.

Hence our work on Knowledge Engine. For that, please read our Knowledge Engine essay and other essays to know what we have done.

If we say software is to digitize human world, then the profession of software programming is about how we digitize various domains of human world. We have domain driven design. Actually the methodologies of agile programming and practice of lean start-ups are also about how we do that work of digitizing various domains of human world.

When we come to online education, we see over and over again that people often treat online education as a place to take tests for a degree or certificate. There are many learning activities in people’s lives that were not captured by these online education software.

Only in the recent years, we get to see breakthrough apps such as khan academy, MOOC, and so on. These breakthrough apps didn’t come from learning theories of education school professors. They also have no real technology breakthrough. They could have happened 5, 6 years ago or even earlier. Their birth is just because someone suddenly realized with all what we have been doing, why not…

Yes, the innovations in the online education field mostly come from thinking outside the box of traditional education system. We are happy to see that now even the mainstream media in America realized this and called for re-think our education from ground up, and really dig into what is learning and what is knowledge, and design software around it.

I was turned off by the elearning research in the academic world about 10 years ago (my research paper only got published 4 years after I wrote it. Well, personally I don’t really care much about publication.) and decided to pursue the research outside of the academic world. Now I am glad to see that people start realizing what is really wrong with our education.

So here is what we share with you our work at Open Source Learning. We would like to get your feedback. If you are willing to join our efforts, you are more than welcome.

发表在 文档, 科学研究, selflearning | 留下评论

Mentored

English Version

我一直相信未来学习/教育的一个很重要的方面,就是每个人都可以成为老师。具体一点说,就是真正有丰富的学习经验有该领域的专业知识的人可以利用自己的业余时间就成为老师,成为优质的教师资源,从而真正改变教师这个职业,实现“教”的意义。我们可以看到现在有不少的网站都在这个方向上努力,比如国内的多贝(主要是视频的类教室教学),或者线下的学习(比如第九课堂,或者以前的Teach Street)。但目前的这些授课模式都有严重的缺陷,无法完全发挥互联网的威力,还不足以挑战传统的主流教学模式。

91笔记想要催生的,是更加互动更加连续性的教学。比如说学习者提出自己想学什么,比如编程,或人力资源,或管理,或摄影。然后其他认为自己可以是这方面老师的人给这个学习者评论,或者初步的学习计划,比如哪些书比较好,需要学习哪些方面的东西,或者自己有什么整理出来的学习资源(91笔记可以帮助老师整理相关的学习资源)。学习者可以从这些评论里挑选一个或几个自己认为好的老师,让这个老师指导自己学习。老师给出需要学习的方面或领域,学生去尝试,并且必须用91笔记记录自己的学习体验,老师给于随时的指导。老师的指导是收费的(可能免费一开始一段时间,然后如果需要继续的指导,则需付费。老师整理的学习资料保持免费。)。

这样的方式,老师可以准确的知道学生的学习状况,进行及时的指导。老师也可以用91笔记来整理自己的学习经验和学习资源,供学生学习。这些学习资源不象传统的教材,仅仅是知识点的板书,而是包含了背后的许多体验和逻辑推理。学生的学习也就不仅仅是知识点的记忆,而更多的是通过自己的体验和推理去复制老师的体验,从而建构自己的知识。老师的教学的重点也就自然的转到引导学生去获得应有的体验,去理性的推理和建构自己的知识体系上面。同时学生通过91笔记培养自己的反思能力和自我对空间的感受能力(学习的核心能力)。这些,当然相对于其他的网站,有更丰富完整的学习体验。而91笔记或者知识引擎的研发,为上述的整个过程提供了背后的技术支持。

当前的很多问答网站,有些象这样的指导的样子。也是这些问答网站可以考虑的如何去深耕或转型的方向。

现在在美国,很多的学习中心,大学和研究机构开始尝试着把反思带回到学习和教学中去,并开始产生很好的学习效果。我想,未来的学习,不会还是象以前一样只是知识点的灌输和应试。学习不会和生活脱节,将是生活中的学习。老师的任务更多的体现在引导学生去通过日常的各种活动去获得关于某领域知识的各个方面和层次的体验,通过对这些体验的反思和理性分析去建立他们自己的知识,也就是培养学生的学习能力和探索知识的能力。这本来就应该是教育的最终目的:放手,让学生能够自己学习。至少在美国,我们现在可以看到明显的学习和教学的方式都开始发生根本的变化,如何从旧有的知识点灌输摆脱出来,将学生的生活实践和体验放到中心的地位,通过体验和反思推理来建构学生自己的知识,如何能够很好的体系的做到这些,应该是我们探索的方向。91笔记或知识引擎,想要做的,就是这方面的尝试。

发表在 selflearning, 演讲 | 留下评论